From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 2/6] vfs: Remove unnecessary list_for_each_entry_safe() variants
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 17:20:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507152007-28753-3-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1507152007-28753-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com>
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
evict_inodes() and invalidate_inodes() use list_for_each_entry_safe()
to iterate sb->s_inodes list. However, since we use i_lru list entry for
our local temporary list of inodes to destroy, the inode is guaranteed
to stay in sb->s_inodes list while we hold sb->s_inode_list_lock. So
there is no real need for safe iteration variant and we can use
list_for_each_entry() just fine.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
---
fs/inode.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index d1e35b5..e70e5fcb 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -601,12 +601,12 @@ static void dispose_list(struct list_head *head)
*/
void evict_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
{
- struct inode *inode, *next;
+ struct inode *inode;
LIST_HEAD(dispose);
again:
spin_lock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(inode, next, &sb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
+ list_for_each_entry(inode, &sb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
if (atomic_read(&inode->i_count))
continue;
@@ -652,11 +652,11 @@ void evict_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
int invalidate_inodes(struct super_block *sb, bool kill_dirty)
{
int busy = 0;
- struct inode *inode, *next;
+ struct inode *inode;
LIST_HEAD(dispose);
spin_lock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(inode, next, &sb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
+ list_for_each_entry(inode, &sb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
if (inode->i_state & (I_NEW | I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE)) {
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-04 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-04 21:20 [PATCH v6 0/6] vfs: Use dlock list for SB's s_inodes list Waiman Long
2017-10-04 21:20 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] lib/dlock-list: Distributed and lock-protected lists Waiman Long
2017-10-04 21:20 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2017-10-04 21:20 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] vfs: Use dlock list for superblock's inode list Waiman Long
2017-10-04 21:20 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] lib/dlock-list: Make sibling CPUs share the same linked list Waiman Long
2017-10-05 8:59 ` Jan Kara
2017-10-05 14:57 ` Waiman Long
2017-10-09 7:26 ` Jan Kara
2017-10-05 17:40 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2017-10-05 18:01 ` Waiman Long
2017-10-07 13:44 ` kbuild test robot
2017-10-07 14:38 ` kbuild test robot
2017-10-04 21:20 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] lib/dlock-list: Enable faster lookup with hashing Waiman Long
2017-10-05 9:14 ` Jan Kara
2017-10-05 11:06 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2017-10-04 21:20 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] lib/dlock-list: Provide IRQ-safe APIs Waiman Long
2017-10-04 22:46 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2017-10-05 13:40 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1507152007-28753-3-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hpe.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).