From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
To: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
<jbaron@akamai.com>, <oleg@redhat.com>, <dave@stgolabs.net>,
<koct9i@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 6/8] epoll: ensure the validity of ep when removing epi in eventpoll_release_file()
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 20:58:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1509195507-29037-7-git-send-email-houtao1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1509195507-29037-1-git-send-email-houtao1@huawei.com>
Before the removal of epmutex, ep_free() will be blocked by epmutex when
invoking eventpoll_release_file(), so epi->ep will be valid.
After the removal of epmutex, epi->ep may be freed during the invocation
of eventpoll_release_file(). We can not use rcu_read_lock/unlock because
we needs to acquire ep->mtx which is a mutex, so we add a ref-counter to
eventpoll and increase it before leaving the rcu read critical region.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
---
fs/eventpoll.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
index e1e4796..27b743b 100644
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
#include <linux/compat.h>
#include <linux/rculist.h>
#include <net/busy_poll.h>
+#include <linux/refcount.h>
/*
* LOCKING:
@@ -231,6 +232,8 @@ struct eventpoll {
unsigned int napi_id;
#endif
+ /* used to ensure the validity of eventpoll when release file */
+ refcount_t ref;
/* used to free itself */
struct rcu_head rcu;
};
@@ -827,6 +830,25 @@ static void ep_rcu_free(struct rcu_head *head)
kfree(ep);
}
+static void eventpoll_put_ep(struct eventpoll *ep)
+{
+ if (refcount_dec_and_test(&ep->ref)) {
+ mutex_destroy(&ep->mtx);
+ free_uid(ep->user);
+ wakeup_source_unregister(ep->ws);
+
+ call_rcu(&ep->rcu, ep_rcu_free);
+ }
+}
+
+static struct eventpoll *eventpoll_get_ep(struct eventpoll *ep)
+{
+ if (refcount_inc_not_zero(&ep->ref))
+ return ep;
+ else
+ return NULL;
+}
+
static void ep_free(struct eventpoll *ep)
{
struct rb_node *rbp;
@@ -883,11 +905,7 @@ static void ep_free(struct eventpoll *ep)
mutex_unlock(&epmutex);
}
- mutex_destroy(&ep->mtx);
- free_uid(ep->user);
- wakeup_source_unregister(ep->ws);
-
- call_rcu(&ep->rcu, ep_rcu_free);
+ eventpoll_put_ep(ep);
}
static int ep_eventpoll_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
@@ -1018,7 +1036,7 @@ static const struct file_operations eventpoll_fops = {
void eventpoll_release_file(struct file *file)
{
struct eventpoll *ep;
- struct epitem *epi, *next;
+ struct epitem *epi;
/*
* We don't want to get "file->f_lock" because it is not
@@ -1039,13 +1057,18 @@ void eventpoll_release_file(struct file *file)
if (!epi)
break;
- ep = epi->ep;
+ ep = eventpoll_get_ep(epi->ep);
+ /* Current epi has been removed by ep_free() */
+ if (!ep)
+ continue;
rcu_read_unlock();
mutex_lock_nested(&ep->mtx, 0);
ep_remove(ep, epi);
mutex_unlock(&ep->mtx);
+ eventpoll_put_ep(ep);
+
rcu_read_lock();
}
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -1084,6 +1107,7 @@ static int ep_alloc(struct eventpoll **pep)
ep->ovflist = EP_UNACTIVE_PTR;
ep->user = user;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ep->visited_list_link);
+ refcount_set(&ep->ref, 1);
*pep = ep;
--
2.7.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-28 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-28 12:58 [RFC][PATCH 0/8] epoll: remove epmutex from ep_free() and eventpoll_release_file() for non-nested case Hou Tao
2017-10-28 12:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/8] epoll: remove epmutex from ep_free() & eventpoll_release_file() Hou Tao
2017-10-28 13:58 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2017-10-30 7:09 ` Hou Tao
2017-10-28 12:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/8] epoll: remove ep from visited_list when freeing ep Hou Tao
2017-10-28 12:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/8] epoll: remove file from tfile_check_list when releasing file Hou Tao
2017-10-28 12:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/8] epoll: free eventpoll by rcu to provide existence guarantee Hou Tao
2017-10-28 12:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/8] epoll: iterate epi in file->f_ep_links by using list_first_or_null_rcu Hou Tao
2017-10-28 12:58 ` Hou Tao [this message]
2017-10-28 12:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/8] epoll: prevent the double-free of epi in eventpoll_release_file() Hou Tao
2017-10-28 12:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/8] epoll: protect the iteration of ep->rbr by ep->mtx in ep_free() Hou Tao
2017-10-31 13:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/8] epoll: remove epmutex from ep_free() and eventpoll_release_file() for non-nested case Davidlohr Bueso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1509195507-29037-7-git-send-email-houtao1@huawei.com \
--to=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=koct9i@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).