linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Vitaly Lipatov <lav@etersoft.ru>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/fcntl: restore checking against COMPAT_LOFF_T_MAX for F_GETLK64
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 06:29:17 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1510658957.5027.12.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171114013009.26716-1-lav@etersoft.ru>

On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 04:30 +0300, Vitaly Lipatov wrote:
> for fcntl64 with F_GETLK64 we need use checking against COMPAT_LOFF_T_MAX.
> 
> Fixes: 94073ad77fff2 "fs/locks: don't mess with the address limit in compat_fcntl64"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Lipatov <lav@etersoft.ru>
> ---
>  fs/fcntl.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fcntl.c b/fs/fcntl.c
> index 30f47d0..fa17f67 100644
> --- a/fs/fcntl.c
> +++ b/fs/fcntl.c
> @@ -604,6 +604,25 @@ static int fixup_compat_flock(struct flock *flock)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * GETLK64 was successful and we need to return the data, but it needs to fit in
> + * the compat structure.
> + * l_start shouldn't be too big, unless the original start + end is greater than
> + * COMPAT_LOFF_T_MAX, in which case the app was asking for trouble, so we return
> + * -EOVERFLOW in that case.  l_len could be too big, in which case we just
> + * truncate it, and only allow the app to see that part of the conflicting lock
> + * that might make sense to it anyway
> + */
> +
> +static int fixup_compat_l_flock(struct flock *flock)
> +{
> +	if (flock->l_start > COMPAT_LOFF_T_MAX)
> +		return -EOVERFLOW;
> +	if (flock->l_len > COMPAT_LOFF_T_MAX)
> +		flock->l_len = COMPAT_LOFF_T_MAX;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +

(cc'ing Christoph since he wrote the original patch)

This patch looks correct to me, but could we rename it to
fixup_compat_flock64 to match the other functions here?

Also, I think this should probably go to stable -- any objections?

>  COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE3(fcntl64, unsigned int, fd, unsigned int, cmd,
>  		       compat_ulong_t, arg)
>  {
> @@ -644,7 +663,7 @@ COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE3(fcntl64, unsigned int, fd, unsigned int, cmd,
>  		err = fcntl_getlk(f.file, convert_fcntl_cmd(cmd), &flock);
>  		if (err)
>  			break;
> -		err = fixup_compat_flock(&flock);
> +		err = fixup_compat_l_flock(&flock);
>  		if (err)
>  			return err;
>  		err = put_compat_flock64(&flock, compat_ptr(arg));


-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-14 11:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-14  1:30 [PATCH] fs/fcntl: restore checking against COMPAT_LOFF_T_MAX for F_GETLK64 Vitaly Lipatov
2017-11-14 11:29 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2017-11-14 11:37   ` Vitaly Lipatov
2017-11-14 13:47 ` [PATCH v2] " Vitaly Lipatov
2017-11-14 14:06   ` Jeff Layton
2017-11-14 16:48     ` Vitaly Lipatov
2017-11-14 16:48   ` [PATCH v3] " Vitaly Lipatov
2017-11-14 17:17     ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-11-14 19:12     ` Jeff Layton
2017-11-14 19:25       ` Vitaly Lipatov
2017-11-14 20:19         ` Jeff Layton
2017-11-14 21:22           ` Vitaly Lipatov
2017-11-15 13:16             ` Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1510658957.5027.12.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=lav@etersoft.ru \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).