From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 1/1] ima: re-introduce own integrity cache lock From: Mimi Zohar To: "Darrick J. Wong" , Dmitry Kasatkin Cc: linux-integrity , linux-security-module , Jan Kara , "Theodore Ts'o" , Chris Mason , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Kasatkin , xfs Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 21:52:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20180103014048.GE5146@magnolia> References: <20180103014048.GE5146@magnolia> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1514947923.3493.2.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 17:40 -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > [might as well cc linux-xfs] > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:22:37AM +0200, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Could I ask FS maintainers to test IMA with this patch additionally > > and provide ack/tested. > > We tested but may be you have and some special testing. > > Super-late to this party, but unless xfstests has automated tests to > set up IMA on top of an existing filesystem then I most likely have no > idea /how/ to test IMA. I did a quick grep of xfstests git and I don't > see anything IMA-related. Back in June I posted a simple xfstests IMA-appraisal test (https://ma rc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=149703820814885&w=4). Mimi