From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Piotr Figiel <figiel@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
paulmck <paulmck@kernel.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@gmail.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>,
Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Oskolkov <posk@google.com>,
Kamil Yurtsever <kyurtsever@google.com>,
Chris Kennelly <ckennelly@google.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs/proc: Expose RSEQ configuration
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 10:44:20 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1530232798.13459.1610725460826.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210114185445.996-1-figiel@google.com>
----- On Jan 14, 2021, at 1:54 PM, Piotr Figiel figiel@google.com wrote:
Added PeterZ, Paul and Boqun to CC. They are also listed as maintainers of rseq.
Please CC them in your next round of patches.
> For userspace checkpoint and restore (C/R) some way of getting process
> state containing RSEQ configuration is needed.
>
> There are two ways this information is going to be used:
> - to re-enable RSEQ for threads which had it enabled before C/R
> - to detect if a thread was in a critical section during C/R
>
> Since C/R preserves TLS memory and addresses RSEQ ABI will be restored
> using the address registered before C/R.
Indeed, if the process goes through a checkpoint/restore while within a
rseq c.s., that critical section should abort. Given that it's only the
restored process which resumes user-space execution, there should be some
way to ensure that the rseq tls pointer is restored before that thread goes
back to user-space, or some way to ensure the rseq TLS is registered
before that thread returns to the saved instruction pointer.
How do you plan to re-register the rseq TLS for each thread upon restore ?
I suspect you move the return IP to the abort either at checkpoint or restore
if you detect that the thread is running in a rseq critical section.
>
> Detection whether the thread is in a critical section during C/R is
> needed to enforce behavior of RSEQ abort during C/R. Attaching with
> ptrace() before registers are dumped itself doesn't cause RSEQ abort.
Right, because the RSEQ abort is only done when going back to user-space,
and AFAIU the checkpointed process will cease to exist, and won't go back
to user-space, therefore bypassing any RSEQ abort.
> Restoring the instruction pointer within the critical section is
> problematic because rseq_cs may get cleared before the control is
> passed to the migrated application code leading to RSEQ invariants not
> being preserved.
The commit message should state that both the per-thread rseq TLS area address
and the signature are dumped within this new proc file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Piotr Figiel <figiel@google.com>
>
> ---
>
> v2:
> - fixed string formatting for 32-bit architectures
>
> v1:
> - https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210113174127.2500051-1-figiel@google.com
>
> ---
> fs/proc/base.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> index b3422cda2a91..7cc36a224b8b 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -662,6 +662,21 @@ static int proc_pid_syscall(struct seq_file *m, struct
> pid_namespace *ns,
>
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RSEQ
> +static int proc_pid_rseq(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
> + struct pid *pid, struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> + int res = lock_trace(task);
AFAIU lock_trace prevents concurrent exec() from modifying the task's content.
What prevents a concurrent rseq register/unregister to be executed concurrently
with proc_pid_rseq ?
> +
> + if (res)
> + return res;
> + seq_printf(m, "%tx %08x\n", (ptrdiff_t)((uintptr_t)task->rseq),
I wonder if all those parentheses are needed. Wouldn't it be enough to have:
(ptrdiff_t)(uintptr_t)task->rseq
?
Thanks,
Mathieu
> + task->rseq_sig);
> + unlock_trace(task);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_RSEQ */
> #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK */
>
> /************************************************************************/
> @@ -3182,6 +3197,9 @@ static const struct pid_entry tgid_base_stuff[] = {
> REG("comm", S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR, proc_pid_set_comm_operations),
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
> ONE("syscall", S_IRUSR, proc_pid_syscall),
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RSEQ
> + ONE("rseq", S_IRUSR, proc_pid_rseq),
> +#endif
> #endif
> REG("cmdline", S_IRUGO, proc_pid_cmdline_ops),
> ONE("stat", S_IRUGO, proc_tgid_stat),
> @@ -3522,6 +3540,9 @@ static const struct pid_entry tid_base_stuff[] = {
> &proc_pid_set_comm_operations, {}),
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
> ONE("syscall", S_IRUSR, proc_pid_syscall),
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RSEQ
> + ONE("rseq", S_IRUSR, proc_pid_rseq),
> +#endif
> #endif
> REG("cmdline", S_IRUGO, proc_pid_cmdline_ops),
> ONE("stat", S_IRUGO, proc_tid_stat),
> --
> 2.30.0.284.gd98b1dd5eaa7-goog
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-15 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-14 18:54 [PATCH v2] fs/proc: Expose RSEQ configuration Piotr Figiel
2021-01-15 15:44 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2021-01-18 17:25 ` Piotr Figiel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1530232798.13459.1610725460826.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avagin@gmail.com \
--cc=bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=ckennelly@google.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=figiel@google.com \
--cc=gladkov.alexey@gmail.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kyurtsever@google.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=posk@google.com \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).