From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl1-f194.google.com ([209.85.214.194]:36132 "EHLO mail-pl1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725751AbeJSEjN (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2018 00:39:13 -0400 Message-ID: <1539894986.81977.32.camel@acm.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] block: move .dma_alignment into q->limits From: Bart Van Assche To: Ming Lei , Jens Axboe Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Vitaly Kuznetsov , Dave Chinner , Linux FS Devel , "Darrick J . Wong" , xfs@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Matthew Wilcox Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 13:36:26 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20181018131817.11813-3-ming.lei@redhat.com> References: <20181018131817.11813-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20181018131817.11813-3-ming.lei@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-7" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2018-10-18 at 21:18 +-0800, Ming Lei wrote: +AD4 Turns out q-+AD4-dma+AF8-alignement should be stack limit because now bvec table +AF4AXgBeAF4AXgBeAF4AXgBeAF4AXgBeAF4AXg dma+AF8-alignment? +AD4 is immutalbe, the underlying queue's dma alignment has to be perceptible +AF4AXgBeAF4AXgBeAF4AXgBe +AF4AXgBeAF4AXgBeAF4AXgBeAF4AXg immutable? observable? +AD4 by stack driver, so IO buffer can be allocated as dma aligned before +AF4AXgBeAF4AXg stacked? Anyway: Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche +ADw-bvanassche+AEA-acm.org+AD4