From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E430FC43219 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 11:32:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39F22075E for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 11:32:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=hansenpartnership.com header.i=@hansenpartnership.com header.b="DcoPWb0p"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=hansenpartnership.com header.i=@hansenpartnership.com header.b="qUwpVC0Q" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727891AbfD2LcS (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Apr 2019 07:32:18 -0400 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:58622 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727846AbfD2LcS (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Apr 2019 07:32:18 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02B9A8EE22B; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 04:32:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1556537538; bh=2iZtI0VfLKpV5ObRkGVTpE3g4x9tbWBVvjAs7KDcmSg=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=DcoPWb0p2NZ40MoDPNrf3ci9S9jsAy/NUbXb5d5odKyojCic8qw5oGZ5rdYCavvdp yZDWqj3sA5kvj17oQq4vXreyHDIa935b/sEjIaXp8SeqcGdXCHo6o+pRJV6WyPWGWP Rxrm7sI7f7OxXXoXKPBP1us/9a6WvuLNuVebB8rk= Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K-7FVscySGeW; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 04:32:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.100.227] (unknown [24.246.103.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C338E8EE03B; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 04:32:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1556537537; bh=2iZtI0VfLKpV5ObRkGVTpE3g4x9tbWBVvjAs7KDcmSg=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qUwpVC0QJuutvZlqdtgObuMf5BV9POiAAXyZCN9P2HmjcRGX8+KOi8BLr/4oZo/+S qHplN5NkWkxuuOmvHzNKiHFHdR2/CjbL851psO4zifniklhjbFcZMLINdzL0eLebm1 3T8oJrams382HTXWYrPU4VoMYP79BEswcW7wv2L8= Message-ID: <1556537518.3119.6.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Subject: Re: [Lsf] [LSF/MM] Preliminary agenda ? Anyone ... anyone ? Bueller ? From: James Bottomley To: "Martin K. Petersen" , Vlastimil Babka Cc: Jens Axboe , lsf@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Jerome Glisse , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 07:31:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: <20190425200012.GA6391@redhat.com> <83fda245-849a-70cc-dde0-5c451938ee97@kernel.dk> <503ba1f9-ad78-561a-9614-1dcb139439a6@suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 06:46 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > Vlastimil, > > > In previous years years there also used to be an attendee list, > > which is now an empty tab. Is that intentional due to GDPR? > > Yes. Actually, GDPR doesn't require this. What it requires is informed consent and legitimate purpose (and since LSF/MM usually publishes the attendee list for attendee co-ordination, that's a legitimate purpose). If you look at the LF form you filled in, you already gave "informed consent": it was the "receive email from sponsors or partners". That's an agreement to share your email address. This is also sufficient consent to share with attendees since they're also "event partners". Next year, simply expand the blurb to "sponsors, partners and attendees" to make it more clear ... or better yet separate them so people can opt out of partner spam and still be on the attendee list. James