linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: "J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vfs: replace i_readcount with a biased i_count
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 08:51:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1560343899.4578.9.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190608135717.8472-2-amir73il@gmail.com>

On Sat, 2019-06-08 at 16:57 +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> Count struct files open RO together with inode reference count instead
> of using a dedicated i_readcount field.  This will allow us to use the
> RO count also when CONFIG_IMA is not defined and will reduce the size of
> struct inode for 32bit archs when CONFIG_IMA is defined.
> 
> We need this RO count for posix leases code, which currently naively
> checks i_count and d_count in an inaccurate manner.
> 
> Should regular i_count overflow into RO count bias by struct files
> opened for write, it's not a big deal, as we mostly need the RO count
> to be reliable when the first writer comes along.

"i_count" has been defined forever.  Has its meaning changed?  This
patch implies that "i_readcount" was never really needed.

Mimi

> 
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19
> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/fs.h                | 33 +++++++++++++++++++------------
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index f7fdfe93e25d..504bf17967dd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -694,9 +694,6 @@ struct inode {
>  	atomic_t		i_count;
>  	atomic_t		i_dio_count;
>  	atomic_t		i_writecount;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_IMA
> -	atomic_t		i_readcount; /* struct files open RO */
> -#endif
>  	union {
>  		const struct file_operations	*i_fop;	/* former ->i_op->default_file_ops */
>  		void (*free_inode)(struct inode *);
> @@ -2890,26 +2887,36 @@ static inline bool inode_is_open_for_write(const struct inode *inode)
>  	return atomic_read(&inode->i_writecount) > 0;
>  }
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_IMA
> +/*
> + * Count struct files open RO together with inode rerefernce count.
> + * We need this count for IMA and for posix leases. The RO count should not
> + * include files opened RDWR nor files opened O_PATH and internal kernel
> + * inode references, like the ones taken by overlayfs and inotify.
> + * Should regular i_count overflow into I_RO_COUNT_BIAS by struct files
> + * opened for write, it's not a big deal, as we mostly need
> + * inode_is_open_rdonly() to be reliable when the first writer comes along.
> + */
> +#define I_RO_COUNT_SHIFT 10
> +#define I_RO_COUNT_BIAS	(1UL << I_RO_COUNT_SHIFT)
> +
>  static inline void i_readcount_dec(struct inode *inode)
>  {
> -	BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&inode->i_readcount));
> -	atomic_dec(&inode->i_readcount);
> +	WARN_ON(atomic_read(&inode->i_count) < I_RO_COUNT_BIAS);
> +	atomic_sub(I_RO_COUNT_BIAS, &inode->i_count);
>  }
>  static inline void i_readcount_inc(struct inode *inode)
>  {
> -	atomic_inc(&inode->i_readcount);
> +	atomic_add(I_RO_COUNT_BIAS, &inode->i_count);
>  }
> -#else
> -static inline void i_readcount_dec(struct inode *inode)
> +static inline int i_readcount_read(const struct inode *inode)
>  {
> -	return;
> +	return atomic_read(&inode->i_count) >> I_RO_COUNT_SHIFT;
>  }
> -static inline void i_readcount_inc(struct inode *inode)
> +static inline bool inode_is_open_rdonly(const struct inode *inode)
>  {
> -	return;
> +	return atomic_read(&inode->i_count) > I_RO_COUNT_BIAS;
>  }
> -#endif
> +
>  extern int do_pipe_flags(int *, int);
>  
>  #define __kernel_read_file_id(id) \
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> index 357edd140c09..766bac778d11 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static void ima_rdwr_violation_check(struct file *file,
>  	bool send_tomtou = false, send_writers = false;
>  
>  	if (mode & FMODE_WRITE) {
> -		if (atomic_read(&inode->i_readcount) && IS_IMA(inode)) {
> +		if (inode_is_open_rdonly(inode) && IS_IMA(inode)) {
>  			if (!iint)
>  				iint = integrity_iint_find(inode);
>  			/* IMA_MEASURE is set from reader side */


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-12 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-08 13:57 [PATCH 0/2] Fix write leases on overlayfs Amir Goldstein
2019-06-08 13:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] vfs: replace i_readcount with a biased i_count Amir Goldstein
2019-06-09 19:36   ` Miklos Szeredi
2019-06-12 12:51   ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2019-06-12 15:09     ` Amir Goldstein
2019-06-12 15:29       ` J . Bruce Fields
2019-06-12 15:35         ` Amir Goldstein
2019-06-12 15:59       ` Mimi Zohar
2019-06-08 13:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] locks: eliminate false positive conflicts for write lease Amir Goldstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1560343899.4578.9.camel@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).