From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F6FC48BD4 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 17:35:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B1C20644 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 17:35:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732081AbfFYRfy (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jun 2019 13:35:54 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:43676 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731942AbfFYRfy (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jun 2019 13:35:54 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5PHWFis062918 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 13:35:53 -0400 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2tbnw1p0s4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 13:35:53 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 18:35:50 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 25 Jun 2019 18:35:45 +0100 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x5PHZjvB52625554 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 25 Jun 2019 17:35:45 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2AF35204E; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 17:35:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.80.110.8]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB9952059; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 17:35:43 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] ima: introduce IMA Digest Lists extension From: Mimi Zohar To: Roberto Sassu , dmitry.kasatkin@huawei.com, mjg59@google.com, Rob Landley Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, silviu.vlasceanu@huawei.com Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 13:35:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <88d368e6-5b3c-0206-23a0-dc3e0aa385f0@huawei.com> References: <20190614175513.27097-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> <9029dd14-1077-ec89-ddc2-e677e16ad314@huawei.com> <88d368e6-5b3c-0206-23a0-dc3e0aa385f0@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19062517-0012-0000-0000-0000032C52A3 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19062517-0013-0000-0000-000021658924 Message-Id: <1561484133.4066.16.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-06-25_12:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906250132 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org [Cc'ing Rob Landley] On Tue, 2019-06-25 at 14:57 +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote: > Mimi, do you have any thoughts on this version? I need to look closer, but when I first looked these changes seemed to be really invasive.  Let's first work on getting the CPIO xattr support upstreamed.  Rob Landley said he was going to review and test them.  Do you have any documentation on how to set up a test environment?  I'd really appreciate if others would also help with reviewing the CPIO patches. thanks! Mimi