From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: "Eric Paris" <eparis@redhat.com>,
"Casey Schaufler" <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
"Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"Richard Guy Briggs" <rgb@redhat.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
"Linux Containers" <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"Linux API" <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux FS Devel" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Network Development" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC(v2): Audit Kernel Container IDs
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 14:37:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1574245.bUo6J1duCc@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1513009857.6310.337.camel@redhat.com>
On Monday, December 11, 2017 11:30:57 AM EST Eric Paris wrote:
> > Because a container doesn't have to use namespaces to be a container
> > you still need a mechanism for a process to declare that it is in
> > fact
> > in a container, and to identify the container.
>
> I like the idea but I'm still tossing it around in my head (and
> thinking about Casey's statement too). Lets say we have a 'docker-like'
> container with pid=100 netns=X,userns=Y,mountns=Z. If I'm on the host
> in all init namespaces and I run
> nsenter -t 100 -n ip link set eth0 promisc on
> How should this be logged?
If it is a normal process, then everything would match the init name space and
you wouldn't have entered a container. If it were a container, any generated
event should have the container ID from registration attached to it.
> Did this command run in it's own 'container' unrelated to the 'docker-like'
> container?
That should be determined by what's in the task struct.
-Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-11 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-12 14:14 RFC(v2): Audit Kernel Container IDs Richard Guy Briggs
2017-10-12 15:45 ` Steve Grubb
2017-10-19 19:57 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-10-19 23:11 ` Aleksa Sarai
2017-10-19 23:15 ` Aleksa Sarai
2017-10-20 2:25 ` Steve Grubb
2017-10-12 16:33 ` Casey Schaufler
2017-10-17 0:33 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-10-17 1:10 ` Casey Schaufler
2017-10-19 0:05 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-10-19 13:32 ` Casey Schaufler
2017-10-19 15:51 ` Paul Moore
2017-10-17 1:42 ` Steve Grubb
2017-10-17 12:31 ` Simo Sorce
2017-10-17 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2017-10-17 15:28 ` Simo Sorce
2017-10-17 15:44 ` James Bottomley
2017-10-17 16:43 ` Casey Schaufler
2017-10-17 17:15 ` Steve Grubb
2017-10-17 17:57 ` James Bottomley
2017-10-18 0:23 ` Steve Grubb
2017-10-18 20:56 ` Paul Moore
2017-10-18 23:46 ` Aleksa Sarai
2017-10-19 0:43 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-10-19 15:36 ` Paul Moore
2017-10-19 16:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-10-19 17:47 ` Paul Moore
2017-10-17 16:10 ` Casey Schaufler
2017-10-18 19:58 ` Paul Moore
2017-12-09 10:20 ` Mickaël Salaün
2017-12-09 18:28 ` Casey Schaufler
2017-12-11 16:30 ` Eric Paris
2017-12-11 16:52 ` Casey Schaufler
2017-12-11 19:37 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2017-12-11 15:10 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-10-12 17:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-10-13 13:43 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1574245.bUo6J1duCc@x2 \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).