Re: Provision for filesystem specific open flags

[Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm>]

On 11/10/2017 10:04 PM, Fu, Rodney wrote:
>> No.  If you want new flags bits, make a public proposal.  Maybe some other
>> filesystem would also benefit from them.
> 
> Ah, I see what you mean now, thanks.
> 
> I would like to propose O_CONCURRENT_WRITE as a new open flag.  It is
> currently used in the Panasas filesystem (panfs) and defined with value:
> 
> #define O_CONCURRENT_WRITE 020000000000
> 
> This flag has been provided by panfs to HPC users via the mpich package for
> well over a decade.  See:
> 
> https://github.com/pmodels/mpich/blob/master/src/mpi/romio/adio/ad_panfs/ad_panfs_open6.c#L344
> 
> O_CONCURRENT_WRITE indicates to the filesystem that the application doing the
> open is participating in a coordinated distributed manner with other such
> applications, possibly running on different hosts.  This allows the panfs
> filesystem to delegate some of the cache coherency responsibilities to the
> application, improving performance.
> 
> The reason this flag is used on open as opposed to having a post-open ioctl or
> fcntl SETFL is to allow panfs to catch and reject opens by applications that
> attempt to access files that have already been opened by applications that have
> set O_CONCURRENT_WRITE.

Hmm, while I see why adding this flag is convenient, it still should be
possible to have an ioctl to open the file and to set the flag? If a
wrong panfs-inode flag is set, failing either the normal- or the
ioctl-open would also work.


Cheers,
Bernd