From: Miles Chen <miles.chen@mediatek.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>, <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v1] proc: use untagged_addr() for pagemap_read addresses
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 09:55:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1606442130.8845.2.camel@mtkswgap22> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lfeqsizr.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 12:32 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Miles Chen <miles.chen@mediatek.com> writes:
>
> > When we try to visit the pagemap of a tagged userspace pointer, we find
> > that the start_vaddr is not correct because of the tag.
> > To fix it, we should untag the usespace pointers in pagemap_read().
> >
> > I tested with 5.10-rc4 and the issue remains.
> >
> > My test code is baed on [1]:
> >
> > A userspace pointer which has been tagged by 0xb4: 0xb400007662f541c8
>
>
> Sigh this patch is buggy.
>
> > === userspace program ===
> >
> > uint64 OsLayer::VirtualToPhysical(void *vaddr) {
> > uint64 frame, paddr, pfnmask, pagemask;
> > int pagesize = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
> > off64_t off = ((uintptr_t)vaddr) / pagesize * 8; // off = 0xb400007662f541c8 / pagesize * 8 = 0x5a00003b317aa0
> > int fd = open(kPagemapPath, O_RDONLY);
> > ...
> >
> > if (lseek64(fd, off, SEEK_SET) != off || read(fd, &frame, 8) != 8) {
> > int err = errno;
> > string errtxt = ErrorString(err);
> > if (fd >= 0)
> > close(fd);
> > return 0;
> > }
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > === kernel fs/proc/task_mmu.c ===
> >
> > static ssize_t pagemap_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> > size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> > {
> > ...
> > src = *ppos;
> > svpfn = src / PM_ENTRY_BYTES; // svpfn == 0xb400007662f54
> > start_vaddr = svpfn << PAGE_SHIFT; // start_vaddr == 0xb400007662f54000
> > end_vaddr = mm->task_size;
> >
> > /* watch out for wraparound */
> > // svpfn == 0xb400007662f54
> > // (mm->task_size >> PAGE) == 0x8000000
> > if (svpfn > mm->task_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) // the condition is true because of the tag 0xb4
> > start_vaddr = end_vaddr;
> >
> > ret = 0;
> > while (count && (start_vaddr < end_vaddr)) { // we cannot visit correct entry because start_vaddr is set to end_vaddr
> > int len;
> > unsigned long end;
> > ...
> > }
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/stressapptest/stressapptest/blob/master/src/os.cc#L158
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Miles Chen <miles.chen@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> > index 217aa2705d5d..e9a70f7ee515 100644
> > --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> > @@ -1599,11 +1599,11 @@ static ssize_t pagemap_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> >
> > src = *ppos;
> > svpfn = src / PM_ENTRY_BYTES;
>
> > - start_vaddr = svpfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
> > + start_vaddr = untagged_addr(svpfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Arguably the line above is safe, but unfortunately it has the
> possibility of suffering from overflow.
>
> > end_vaddr = mm->task_size;
> >
> > /* watch out for wraparound */
> > - if (svpfn > mm->task_size >> PAGE_SHIFT)
> > + if (start_vaddr > mm->task_size)
> > start_vaddr = end_vaddr;
>
> Overflow handling you are removing here.
> >
> > /*
>
>
> I suspect the proper way to handle this is to move the test for
> overflow earlier so the code looks something like:
>
> end_vaddr = mm->task_size;
>
> src = *ppos;
> svpfn = src / PM_ENTRY_BYTES;
>
> /* watch out for wraparound */
> start_vaddr = end_vaddr;
> if (svpfn < (ULONG_MAX >> PAGE_SHIFT))
> start_vaddr = untagged_addr(svpfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
>
> /* Ensure the address is inside the task */
> if (start_vaddr > mm->task_size)
> start_vaddr = end_vaddr;
Thanks for the comment, I will fix that in patch v2.
Miles
>
> Eric
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-27 1:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-23 6:38 [RESEND PATCH v1] proc: use untagged_addr() for pagemap_read addresses Miles Chen
2020-11-24 18:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-11-27 1:55 ` Miles Chen [this message]
2020-11-26 7:16 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2020-11-26 7:49 ` Miles Chen
2020-11-26 7:57 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2020-11-26 9:29 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2020-11-26 11:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-27 3:16 ` Miles Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1606442130.8845.2.camel@mtkswgap22 \
--to=miles.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).