[PATCH] direct-io: Using kmem_cache_zalloc() instead of kmem_cache_alloc() and memset()

[PATCH] direct-io: Using kmem_cache_zalloc() instead of kmem_cache_alloc() and memset()

[Yang Li]

Fix the following coccicheck warning:
./fs/direct-io.c:1155:7-23: WARNING: kmem_cache_zalloc should be used
for dio, instead of kmem_cache_alloc/memset

Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 fs/direct-io.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c
index 0957e1b..6ec2935 100644
--- a/fs/direct-io.c
+++ b/fs/direct-io.c
@@ -1152,7 +1152,7 @@ static inline int drop_refcount(struct dio *dio)
 	if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == READ && !count)
 		return 0;
 
-	dio = kmem_cache_alloc(dio_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
+	dio = kmem_cache_zalloc(dio_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!dio)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	/*
@@ -1160,8 +1160,6 @@ static inline int drop_refcount(struct dio *dio)
 	 * performance regression in a database benchmark.  So, we take
 	 * care to only zero out what's needed.
 	 */
-	memset(dio, 0, offsetof(struct dio, pages));
-
 	dio->flags = flags;
 	if (dio->flags & DIO_LOCKING && iov_iter_rw(iter) == READ) {
 		/* will be released by direct_io_worker */
-- 
1.8.3.1

Re: [PATCH] direct-io: Using kmem_cache_zalloc() instead of kmem_cache_alloc() and memset()

[Jeff Moyer]

Y, Yang,

Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com> writes:

> Fix the following coccicheck warning:
> ./fs/direct-io.c:1155:7-23: WARNING: kmem_cache_zalloc should be used
> for dio, instead of kmem_cache_alloc/memset
>
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  fs/direct-io.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c
> index 0957e1b..6ec2935 100644
> --- a/fs/direct-io.c
> +++ b/fs/direct-io.c
> @@ -1152,7 +1152,7 @@ static inline int drop_refcount(struct dio *dio)
>  	if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == READ && !count)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	dio = kmem_cache_alloc(dio_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	dio = kmem_cache_zalloc(dio_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!dio)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	/*
> @@ -1160,8 +1160,6 @@ static inline int drop_refcount(struct dio *dio)
>  	 * performance regression in a database benchmark.  So, we take
>  	 * care to only zero out what's needed.
>  	 */
> -	memset(dio, 0, offsetof(struct dio, pages));
> -

You must have missed the comment just above this memset:

        /*
         * Believe it or not, zeroing out the page array caused a .5%
         * performance regression in a database benchmark.  So, we take
         * care to only zero out what's needed.
         */

That's referring to this part of the dio struct:

        /*
         * pages[] (and any fields placed after it) are not zeroed out at
         * allocation time.  Don't add new fields after pages[] unless you
         * wish that they not be zeroed.
         */
        union {
                struct page *pages[DIO_PAGES];  /* page buffer */
                struct work_struct complete_work;/* deferred AIO completion */
        };
} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;

Nacked-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>