From: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>
To: chuck.lever@oracle.com, bfields@fieldses.org
Cc: jlayton@redhat.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC v24 6/7] NFSD: add support for lock conflict to courteous server
Date: Sun, 1 May 2022 10:38:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1651426696-15509-7-git-send-email-dai.ngo@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1651426696-15509-1-git-send-email-dai.ngo@oracle.com>
This patch allows expired client with lock state to be in COURTESY
state. Lock conflict with COURTESY client is resolved by the fs/lock
code using the lm_lock_expirable and lm_expire_lock callback in the
struct lock_manager_operations.
If conflict client is in COURTESY state, set it to EXPIRABLE and
schedule the laundromat to run immediately to expire the client. The
callback lm_expire_lock waits for the laundromat to flush its work
queue before returning to caller.
Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index f369142da79f..4ab7dda44f38 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -5715,39 +5715,51 @@ static void nfsd4_ssc_expire_umount(struct nfsd_net *nn)
}
#endif
+/* Check if any lock belonging to this lockowner has any blockers */
static bool
-nfs4_has_any_locks(struct nfs4_client *clp)
+nfs4_lockowner_has_blockers(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo)
+{
+ struct file_lock_context *ctx;
+ struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp;
+ struct nfs4_file *nf;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(stp, &lo->lo_owner.so_stateids, st_perstateowner) {
+ nf = stp->st_stid.sc_file;
+ ctx = nf->fi_inode->i_flctx;
+ if (!ctx)
+ continue;
+ if (locks_owner_has_blockers(ctx, lo))
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+static bool
+nfs4_anylock_blockers(struct nfs4_client *clp)
{
int i;
struct nfs4_stateowner *so;
+ struct nfs4_lockowner *lo;
+ if (atomic_read(&clp->cl_delegs_in_recall))
+ return true;
spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
for (i = 0; i < OWNER_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
list_for_each_entry(so, &clp->cl_ownerstr_hashtbl[i],
so_strhash) {
if (so->so_is_open_owner)
continue;
- spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
- return true;
+ lo = lockowner(so);
+ if (nfs4_lockowner_has_blockers(lo)) {
+ spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
+ return true;
+ }
}
}
spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
return false;
}
-/*
- * place holder for now, no check for lock blockers yet
- */
-static bool
-nfs4_anylock_blockers(struct nfs4_client *clp)
-{
- if (atomic_read(&clp->cl_delegs_in_recall) ||
- !list_empty(&clp->async_copies) ||
- nfs4_has_any_locks(clp))
- return true;
- return false;
-}
-
static void
nfs4_get_client_reaplist(struct nfsd_net *nn, struct list_head *reaplist,
struct laundry_time *lt)
@@ -6712,6 +6724,29 @@ nfsd4_lm_put_owner(fl_owner_t owner)
nfs4_put_stateowner(&lo->lo_owner);
}
+/* return pointer to struct nfs4_client if client is expirable */
+static bool
+nfsd4_lm_lock_expirable(struct file_lock *cfl)
+{
+ struct nfs4_lockowner *lo = (struct nfs4_lockowner *)cfl->fl_owner;
+ struct nfs4_client *clp = lo->lo_owner.so_client;
+ struct nfsd_net *nn;
+
+ if (try_to_expire_client(clp)) {
+ nn = net_generic(clp->net, nfsd_net_id);
+ mod_delayed_work(laundry_wq, &nn->laundromat_work, 0);
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+/* schedule laundromat to run immediately and wait for it to complete */
+static void
+nfsd4_lm_expire_lock(void)
+{
+ flush_workqueue(laundry_wq);
+}
+
static void
nfsd4_lm_notify(struct file_lock *fl)
{
@@ -6738,9 +6773,12 @@ nfsd4_lm_notify(struct file_lock *fl)
}
static const struct lock_manager_operations nfsd_posix_mng_ops = {
+ .lm_mod_owner = THIS_MODULE,
.lm_notify = nfsd4_lm_notify,
.lm_get_owner = nfsd4_lm_get_owner,
.lm_put_owner = nfsd4_lm_put_owner,
+ .lm_lock_expirable = nfsd4_lm_lock_expirable,
+ .lm_expire_lock = nfsd4_lm_expire_lock,
};
static inline void
--
2.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-01 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-01 17:38 [PATCH RFC v24 0/7] NFSD: Initial implementation of NFSv4 Courteous Server Dai Ngo
2022-05-01 17:38 ` [PATCH RFC v24 1/7] NFSD: add courteous server support for thread with only delegation Dai Ngo
2022-05-02 15:23 ` J. Bruce Fields
2022-05-01 17:38 ` [PATCH RFC v24 2/7] NFSD: add support for share reservation conflict to courteous server Dai Ngo
2022-05-02 15:31 ` J. Bruce Fields
2022-05-01 17:38 ` [PATCH RFC v24 3/7] NFSD: move create/destroy of laundry_wq to init_nfsd and exit_nfsd Dai Ngo
2022-05-02 15:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2022-05-01 17:38 ` [PATCH RFC v24 4/7] fs/lock: add helper locks_owner_has_blockers to check for blockers Dai Ngo
2022-05-02 15:43 ` J. Bruce Fields
2022-05-01 17:38 ` [PATCH RFC v24 5/7] fs/lock: add 2 callbacks to lock_manager_operations to resolve conflict Dai Ngo
2022-05-02 15:53 ` J. Bruce Fields
2022-05-01 17:38 ` Dai Ngo [this message]
2022-05-02 16:00 ` [PATCH RFC v24 6/7] NFSD: add support for lock conflict to courteous server J. Bruce Fields
2022-05-01 17:38 ` [PATCH RFC v24 7/7] NFSD: Show state of courtesy client in client info Dai Ngo
2022-05-02 16:06 ` J. Bruce Fields
2022-05-02 16:07 ` [PATCH RFC v24 0/7] NFSD: Initial implementation of NFSv4 Courteous Server J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1651426696-15509-7-git-send-email-dai.ngo@oracle.com \
--to=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).