From: "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp>
To: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@centrum.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, vaurora@redhat.com
Subject: Re: UnionMount status?
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:10:40 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17402.1268979040@jrobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a5d587fb1003181721m49d2debey48c6a6acc326a9a6@mail.gmail.com>
Michal Suchanek:
> I was wondering in what state is the Linux UnionMount. As all other
> union solutions were rejected from the kernel so far the development
> on them is stagnating and it's not exactly easy to get them patched on
> top of new kernels.
As far as I know, the development on aufs (one of other union solution)
is not stagnating, and you can easily apply it against the latest -rc
kernel.
But it never means to keep Val's UnionMount from mainlining.
J. R. Okajima
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-19 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-19 0:21 UnionMount status? Michal Suchanek
2010-03-19 6:10 ` J. R. Okajima [this message]
2010-03-19 20:28 ` Michal Suchanek
2010-03-19 20:59 ` J. R. Okajima
2010-03-19 18:03 ` Valerie Aurora
2010-03-19 21:47 ` Michal Suchanek
2010-03-20 16:41 ` Michal Suchanek
2010-03-23 23:02 ` Valerie Aurora
2010-04-01 15:36 ` Michal Suchanek
2010-07-14 13:12 ` Michal Suchanek
2010-07-14 19:30 ` Valerie Aurora
2010-07-19 16:06 ` Michal Suchanek
2010-08-10 16:52 ` Valerie Aurora
[not found] ` <AANLkTik+S2femtfOQvAYMayfN2N=PGvVL8J9=AD3_VCa@mail.gmail.com>
2010-08-16 18:52 ` Valerie Aurora
2010-08-17 12:03 ` Michal Suchanek
2010-08-17 14:31 ` Michal Suchanek
2010-08-17 19:51 ` Valerie Aurora
2010-08-18 11:30 ` Michal Suchanek
2010-08-18 19:06 ` Valerie Aurora
2010-08-18 19:25 ` Michal Suchanek
2010-07-12 13:01 ` Michal Suchanek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-12 15:00 Unionmount status? Michal Suchanek
2011-04-12 20:31 ` Ric Wheeler
2011-04-12 21:36 ` Michal Suchanek
2011-04-13 14:18 ` Jiri Kosina
2011-04-13 15:13 ` Michal Suchanek
2011-04-14 8:38 ` Miklos Szeredi
2011-04-14 9:48 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-14 9:58 ` Miklos Szeredi
2011-04-15 11:22 ` Michal Suchanek
2011-04-15 11:31 ` Miklos Szeredi
2011-04-15 11:51 ` Michal Suchanek
2011-04-15 12:29 ` Miklos Szeredi
2011-04-15 12:34 ` Michal Suchanek
2011-04-15 12:48 ` Miklos Szeredi
2011-04-15 21:48 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-04-15 22:18 ` Andreas Dilger
2011-04-18 13:31 ` Michal Suchanek
2011-04-18 13:34 ` Michal Suchanek
2011-04-18 13:37 ` Michal Suchanek
2011-04-13 17:26 ` Ric Wheeler
2011-04-13 18:58 ` Michal Suchanek
2011-04-13 19:11 ` Ric Wheeler
2011-04-13 19:47 ` Michal Suchanek
2011-04-14 4:50 ` Ian Kent
2011-04-14 9:32 ` Michal Suchanek
2011-04-14 9:40 ` Miklos Szeredi
2011-04-14 13:21 ` Ric Wheeler
2011-04-14 14:54 ` Michal Suchanek
2011-04-15 16:31 ` Ric Wheeler
2011-04-14 19:14 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17402.1268979040@jrobl \
--to=hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp \
--cc=hramrach@centrum.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vaurora@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox