From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH] BLOCK: Make it possible to disable the block layer Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:18:27 +0100 Message-ID: <17931.1156439907@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> References: <20060824155814.GL19810@stusta.de> <32640.1156424442@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <20060824152937.GK19810@stusta.de> <1156434274.3012.128.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Cc: David Woodhouse , David Howells , Jens Axboe , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:14745 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030398AbWHXRTl (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:19:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20060824155814.GL19810@stusta.de> To: Adrian Bunk Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Adrian Bunk wrote: > CONFIG_BLOCK=n will only be for the "the kernel must become as fast as > possible, and I really know what I'm doing" people. It's not a speed thing so much as a space thing. David