From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/09] cifs: local caching support using FS-Cache Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:40:00 +0100 Message-ID: <1892.1279820400@redhat.com> References: <4C480F51.8070204@suse.de> <1278333663-30464-1-git-send-email-sjayaraman@suse.de> <4C3DF6BF.3070001@gmail.com> <4C3F35F7.8060408@suse.de> Cc: dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, Steve French , Scott Lovenberg , linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-cachefs-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org To: Suresh Jayaraman Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4C480F51.8070204-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Suresh Jayaraman wrote: > As it can been seen, the performance while reading when data is cache > hot (disk) is not great as the network link is a Gigabit ethernet (with > server having working set in memory) which is mostly expected. That's what I see with NFS and AFS too. > (I could not get access to a slower network (say 100 Mb/s) where the real > performance boost could be evident). ethtool? David