From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: tridge@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added CONFIG_VFAT_FS_DUALNAMES option
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:51:01 +1000
Message-ID: <19017.21349.354386.847874@samba.org>
References: <19013.8005.541836.436991@samba.org>
	<m1d48p5dil.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
	<19014.54044.484370.187018@samba.org>
	<m1vdmh2e26.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
	<19015.482.794111.612472@samba.org>
	<87ab3sx4ch.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
	<19016.6463.997760.757811@samba.org>
	<20090629221826.GA12781@kroah.com>
	<19017.17250.371594.268824@samba.org>
	<87tz1ymx3m.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
Reply-To: tridge@samba.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>, john.lanza@linux.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>,
	Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:60419 "EHLO lists.samba.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751680AbZF2XvO (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:51:14 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87tz1ymx3m.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

Hirofumi-san writes:
 > Yes. And I will not drop this patch even if it's not perfect on test. I
 > can understand it would not be the option for some users.

ok, good

 > The default may be arguable though, like I said at first.

I suggest we leave the default as "no dual names" for now to let it
get some more testing, then if any problems come up then we can look
at the choice of default again. If no problems come up we can keep the
default as it is in the patch now.

Cheers, Tridge