From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tridge@samba.org Subject: Re: CONFIG_VFAT_FS_DUALNAMES regressions Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:30:18 +1000 Message-ID: <19028.19210.992993.643974@samba.org> References: <19021.19842.663727.146474@samba.org> <87hbxu60qm.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <19021.23231.213863.726785@samba.org> <19021.26102.80885.330380@samba.org> <19021.31291.642416.956966@samba.org> <19021.63615.450348.192109@samba.org> <20090706200431.GC13638@shareable.org> Reply-To: tridge@samba.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jan Engelhardt , OGAWA Hirofumi , Theodore Tso , Alan Cox , Rusty Russell , Pavel Machek , john.lanza@linux.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Kleikamp , corbet@lwn.net, jcm@jonmasters.org To: Jamie Lokier Return-path: Received: from mail.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:39499 "EHLO lists.samba.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757339AbZGHHm2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2009 03:42:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090706200431.GC13638@shareable.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Jamie, > I think it's ok to break that compatibility if dualnames is off, > because that's unfortunately the best available compromise. You probably noticed this, but the patch that has been put in only changes the shortname setting when dualnames is off. Cheers, Tridge