From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org,
surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: fix the inaccurate memory statistics issue for users
Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 09:25:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1963f1b2-5879-49a8-99db-41acbfc58ff3@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67n3snrowiyxjw6grddyer7np5rpnpg4x5f6bsyonmgcc5k5eq@s5v4ux27i4fw>
On 2025/5/23 22:11, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> CC Mathieu
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 11:16:13AM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> On some large machines with a high number of CPUs running a 64K kernel,
>> we found that the 'RES' field is always 0 displayed by the top command
>> for some processes, which will cause a lot of confusion for users.
>>
>> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
>> 875525 root 20 0 12480 0 0 R 0.3 0.0 0:00.08 top
>> 1 root 20 0 172800 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:04.52 systemd
>>
>> The main reason is that the batch size of the percpu counter is quite large
>> on these machines, caching a significant percpu value, since converting mm's
>> rss stats into percpu_counter by commit f1a7941243c1 ("mm: convert mm's rss
>> stats into percpu_counter"). Intuitively, the batch number should be optimized,
>> but on some paths, performance may take precedence over statistical accuracy.
>> Therefore, introducing a new interface to add the percpu statistical count
>> and display it to users, which can remove the confusion. In addition, this
>> change is not expected to be on a performance-critical path, so the modification
>> should be acceptable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
>
> Hi Baolin, this seems reasonale. For long term Mathieu is planning to
> fix this with newer hierarchical percpu counter until then this looks
> good.
OK. Good.
> Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-24 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-23 3:16 [RFC PATCH] mm: fix the inaccurate memory statistics issue for users Baolin Wang
2025-05-23 5:25 ` Donet Tom
2025-05-23 5:47 ` Baolin Wang
2025-05-23 10:14 ` Aboorva Devarajan
2025-05-24 1:24 ` Baolin Wang
2025-05-30 10:23 ` Michal Hocko
2025-05-23 14:11 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-05-24 1:25 ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2025-05-23 17:20 ` SeongJae Park
2025-05-23 17:23 ` SeongJae Park
2025-05-24 1:29 ` Baolin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1963f1b2-5879-49a8-99db-41acbfc58ff3@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).