linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>,
	Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>,
	Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
	Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] btrfs: refactor and generalize chunk/dev_extent/extent allocation
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 09:02:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1977483.1kS9YxoVVV@merkaba> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200207060600.bxcot22i3tpemrn5@naota.dhcp.fujisawa.hgst.com>

Naohiro Aota - 07.02.20, 07:06:00 CET:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:43:30PM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> >Hi Naohiro.
> >
> >Naohiro Aota - 06.02.20, 11:41:54 CET:
> >> This series refactors chunk allocation, device_extent allocation
> >> and
> >> extent allocation functions and make them generalized to be able to
> >> implement other allocation policy easily.
> >> 
> >> On top of this series, we can simplify some part of the "btrfs:
> >> zoned
> >> block device support" series as adding a new type of chunk
> >> allocator
> >> and extent allocator for zoned block devices. Furthermore, we will
> >> be
> >> able to implement and test some other allocator in the idea page of
> >> the wiki e.g. SSD caching, dedicated metadata drive, chunk
> >> allocation
> >> groups, and so on.
> >
> >Regarding SSD caching, are you aware that there has been previous
> >work with even involved handling part of it in the Virtual
> >Filesystem Switch (VFS)?
> >
> >VFS hot-data tracking, LWN article:
> >
> >https://lwn.net/Articles/525651/
> >
> >Patchset, not sure whether it is the most recent one:
> >
> >[PATCH v2 00/12] VFS hot tracking
> >
> >https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/1368493184-5939-1-git-send-email-> >zwu.kernel@gmail.com/
> Yes, I once saw the patchset. Not sure about the detail, though.
> 
> >So for SSD caching you may be able to re-use or pick up some of this
> >work, unless it would be unsuitable to be used with this new
> >approach.
> Currently, I have no plan to implement the SSD caching feature by
> myself. I think some patches of the series like this [1] can be
> reworked on my series as adding an "SSD caching chunk allocator." So,
> it's welcome to hear suggestions about the hook interface.

Thank you. Adding Zhi Yong Wu to Cc.

I don't know details about this patch set either.

@Zhi Yong Wu: Are you interested interested in rebasing your SSD caching 
patch above this refactoring work?

Ciao,
Martin

> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/1371817260-8615-3-git-send-email-> zwu.kernel@gmail.com/
> >Thanks,


-- 
Martin



      reply	other threads:[~2020-02-07  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-06 10:41 [PATCH 00/20] btrfs: refactor and generalize chunk/dev_extent/extent allocation Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 10:41 ` [PATCH 01/20] btrfs: change type of full_search to bool Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 11:26   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-02-06 16:03   ` Josef Bacik
2020-02-06 10:41 ` [PATCH 02/20] btrfs: introduce chunk allocation policy Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 11:30   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-02-07  6:11     ` Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 16:06   ` Josef Bacik
2020-02-06 16:07   ` Josef Bacik
2020-02-06 10:41 ` [PATCH 03/20] btrfs: refactor find_free_dev_extent_start() Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 12:02   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-02-07  6:22     ` Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 16:34   ` Josef Bacik
2020-02-06 10:41 ` [PATCH 04/20] btrfs: introduce alloc_chunk_ctl Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 12:07   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-02-06 16:38   ` Josef Bacik
2020-02-07  7:08     ` Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 10:41 ` [PATCH 05/20] btrfs: factor out set_parameters() Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 13:51   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-02-06 16:40   ` Josef Bacik
2020-02-07  7:59     ` Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 10:42 ` [PATCH 06/20] btrfs: factor out gather_device_info() Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 15:43   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-02-07  9:54     ` Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 16:44   ` Josef Bacik
2020-02-06 10:42 ` [PATCH 07/20] btrfs: factor out decide_stripe_size() Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 15:59   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-02-06 16:47   ` Josef Bacik
2020-02-06 10:42 ` [PATCH 08/20] btrfs: factor out create_chunk() Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 16:49   ` Josef Bacik
2020-02-07  9:17     ` Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 10:42 ` [PATCH 09/20] btrfs: parameterize dev_extent_min Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 16:52   ` Josef Bacik
2020-02-07  9:00     ` Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 10:42 ` [PATCH 10/20] btrfs: introduce extent allocation policy Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 10:42 ` [PATCH 11/20] btrfs: move hint_byte into find_free_extent_ctl Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 10:42 ` [PATCH 12/20] btrfs: introduce clustered_alloc_info Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 12:44   ` Su Yue
2020-02-07  9:25     ` Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 17:01   ` Josef Bacik
2020-02-07  9:53     ` Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 10:42 ` [PATCH 13/20] btrfs: factor out do_allocation() Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 10:42 ` [PATCH 14/20] btrfs: drop unnecessary arguments from clustered allocation functions Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 10:42 ` [PATCH 15/20] btrfs: factor out release_block_group() Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 10:42 ` [PATCH 16/20] btrfs: factor out found_extent() Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 10:42 ` [PATCH 17/20] btrfs: drop unnecessary arguments from find_free_extent_update_loop() Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 10:42 ` [PATCH 18/20] btrfs: factor out chunk_allocation_failed() Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 10:42 ` [PATCH 19/20] btrfs: skip LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE if not clustered allocation Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 10:42 ` [PATCH 20/20] btrfs: factor out prepare_allocation() Naohiro Aota
2020-02-06 11:43 ` [PATCH 00/20] btrfs: refactor and generalize chunk/dev_extent/extent allocation Martin Steigerwald
2020-02-07  6:06   ` Naohiro Aota
2020-02-07  8:02     ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1977483.1kS9YxoVVV@merkaba \
    --to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
    --cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=naohiro.aota@wdc.com \
    --cc=nborisov@suse.com \
    --cc=wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).