linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Siddharth Gupta <sidgup@codeaurora.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: mcgrof@kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"psodagud@codeaurora.org" <psodagud@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Firmware loader fallback mechanism no longer works with sendfile
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 10:31:26 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1adf9aa4-ed7e-8f05-a354-57419d61ec18@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <X/hv634I9JOoHZRk@kroah.com>


On 1/8/2021 6:44 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 02:03:47PM -0800, Siddharth Gupta wrote:
>> On 1/6/2021 2:33 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>>>>>> Since the binary attributes don't support splice_{read,write} functions the
>>>>>> calls to splice_{read,write} used the default kernel_{read,write} functions.
>>>>>> With the above change this results in an -EINVAL return from
>>>>>> do_splice_from[4].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This essentially means that sendfile will not work for any binary attribute
>>>>>> in the sysfs.
>>>>> Have you tried fixing this with a patch much like what we did for the
>>>>> proc files that needed this?  If not, can you?
>>>> I am not aware of this fix, could you provide me a link for reference? I
>>>> will try it out.
>>> Look at the series of commits starting at fe33850ff798 ("proc: wire up
>>> generic_file_splice_read for iter ops") for how this was fixed in procfs
>>> as an example of what also needs to be done for binary sysfs files.
>> I tried to follow these fixes, but I am unfamiliar with fs code. I don't see
>> the generic_file_splice_write function anymore on newer kernels, also AFAICT
>> kernfs_ops does not define {read,write}_iter operations. If the solution is
>> simple and someone could provide the patches I would be happy to test them
>> out. If not, some more information about how to proceed would be nice.
> Can you try this tiny patch out below?
Sorry for the delay, I tried out the patch, but I am still seeing the 
error. Please take a look at these logs with
android running in the userspace[1]:

[   62.295056][  T249] remoteproc remoteproc1: powering up 
xxxxxxxx.remoteproc-cdsp
[   62.304138][  T249] remoteproc remoteproc1: Direct firmware load for 
cdsp.mdt failed with error -2
[   62.312976][  T249] remoteproc remoteproc1: Falling back to sysfs 
fallback for: cdsp.mdt
[   62.469748][  T394] ueventd: firmware: loading 'cdsp.mdt' for 
'/devices/platform/soc/xxxxxxxx.remoteproc-cdsp/remoteproc/remoteproc1/cdsp.mdt'
[   62.498700][  T394] ueventd: firmware: sendfile failed { 
'/sys/devices/platform/soc/xxxxxxxx.remoteproc-cdsp/remoteproc/remoteproc1/cdsp.mdt', 
'cdsp.mdt' }: Invalid argument

Thanks,
Sid

[1]: 
https://android.googlesource.com/platform/system/core/+/refs/heads/master/init/firmware_handler.cpp#57
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> diff --git a/fs/kernfs/file.c b/fs/kernfs/file.c
> index f277d023ebcd..113bc816d430 100644
> --- a/fs/kernfs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/kernfs/file.c
> @@ -968,6 +968,8 @@ const struct file_operations kernfs_file_fops = {
>   	.release	= kernfs_fop_release,
>   	.poll		= kernfs_fop_poll,
>   	.fsync		= noop_fsync,
> +	.splice_read	= generic_file_splice_read,
> +	.splice_write	= iter_file_splice_write,
>   };
>   
>   /**

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-12 18:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-04 22:43 PROBLEM: Firmware loader fallback mechanism no longer works with sendfile Siddharth Gupta
2021-01-05  6:36 ` Greg KH
2021-01-06  1:00   ` Siddharth Gupta
2021-01-06 10:33     ` Greg KH
2021-01-07 22:03       ` Siddharth Gupta
2021-01-08 14:44         ` Greg KH
2021-01-12 18:31           ` Siddharth Gupta [this message]
2021-01-15 16:20             ` Greg KH
2021-01-18  0:59               ` Siddharth Gupta
2021-01-20  9:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-20 20:28   ` Siddharth Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1adf9aa4-ed7e-8f05-a354-57419d61ec18@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sidgup@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=psodagud@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).