From: Siddharth Gupta <sidgup@codeaurora.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: mcgrof@kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"psodagud@codeaurora.org" <psodagud@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Firmware loader fallback mechanism no longer works with sendfile
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 10:31:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1adf9aa4-ed7e-8f05-a354-57419d61ec18@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <X/hv634I9JOoHZRk@kroah.com>
On 1/8/2021 6:44 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 02:03:47PM -0800, Siddharth Gupta wrote:
>> On 1/6/2021 2:33 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>>>>>> Since the binary attributes don't support splice_{read,write} functions the
>>>>>> calls to splice_{read,write} used the default kernel_{read,write} functions.
>>>>>> With the above change this results in an -EINVAL return from
>>>>>> do_splice_from[4].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This essentially means that sendfile will not work for any binary attribute
>>>>>> in the sysfs.
>>>>> Have you tried fixing this with a patch much like what we did for the
>>>>> proc files that needed this? If not, can you?
>>>> I am not aware of this fix, could you provide me a link for reference? I
>>>> will try it out.
>>> Look at the series of commits starting at fe33850ff798 ("proc: wire up
>>> generic_file_splice_read for iter ops") for how this was fixed in procfs
>>> as an example of what also needs to be done for binary sysfs files.
>> I tried to follow these fixes, but I am unfamiliar with fs code. I don't see
>> the generic_file_splice_write function anymore on newer kernels, also AFAICT
>> kernfs_ops does not define {read,write}_iter operations. If the solution is
>> simple and someone could provide the patches I would be happy to test them
>> out. If not, some more information about how to proceed would be nice.
> Can you try this tiny patch out below?
Sorry for the delay, I tried out the patch, but I am still seeing the
error. Please take a look at these logs with
android running in the userspace[1]:
[ 62.295056][ T249] remoteproc remoteproc1: powering up
xxxxxxxx.remoteproc-cdsp
[ 62.304138][ T249] remoteproc remoteproc1: Direct firmware load for
cdsp.mdt failed with error -2
[ 62.312976][ T249] remoteproc remoteproc1: Falling back to sysfs
fallback for: cdsp.mdt
[ 62.469748][ T394] ueventd: firmware: loading 'cdsp.mdt' for
'/devices/platform/soc/xxxxxxxx.remoteproc-cdsp/remoteproc/remoteproc1/cdsp.mdt'
[ 62.498700][ T394] ueventd: firmware: sendfile failed {
'/sys/devices/platform/soc/xxxxxxxx.remoteproc-cdsp/remoteproc/remoteproc1/cdsp.mdt',
'cdsp.mdt' }: Invalid argument
Thanks,
Sid
[1]:
https://android.googlesource.com/platform/system/core/+/refs/heads/master/init/firmware_handler.cpp#57
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> diff --git a/fs/kernfs/file.c b/fs/kernfs/file.c
> index f277d023ebcd..113bc816d430 100644
> --- a/fs/kernfs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/kernfs/file.c
> @@ -968,6 +968,8 @@ const struct file_operations kernfs_file_fops = {
> .release = kernfs_fop_release,
> .poll = kernfs_fop_poll,
> .fsync = noop_fsync,
> + .splice_read = generic_file_splice_read,
> + .splice_write = iter_file_splice_write,
> };
>
> /**
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-12 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-04 22:43 PROBLEM: Firmware loader fallback mechanism no longer works with sendfile Siddharth Gupta
2021-01-05 6:36 ` Greg KH
2021-01-06 1:00 ` Siddharth Gupta
2021-01-06 10:33 ` Greg KH
2021-01-07 22:03 ` Siddharth Gupta
2021-01-08 14:44 ` Greg KH
2021-01-12 18:31 ` Siddharth Gupta [this message]
2021-01-15 16:20 ` Greg KH
2021-01-18 0:59 ` Siddharth Gupta
2021-01-20 9:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-20 20:28 ` Siddharth Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1adf9aa4-ed7e-8f05-a354-57419d61ec18@codeaurora.org \
--to=sidgup@codeaurora.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=psodagud@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).