Re: [PATCH v1] fuse: remove unneeded atomic set in uring creation

[Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm>]

On 3/18/25 01:41, Joanne Koong wrote:
> When the ring is allocated, it is kzalloc-ed. ring->queue_refs will
> already be initialized to 0 by default. It does not need to be
> atomically set to 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
> ---
>  fs/fuse/dev_uring.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c b/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c
> index ab8c26042aa8..f54d150330a9 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c
> @@ -239,7 +239,6 @@ static struct fuse_ring *fuse_uring_create(struct fuse_conn *fc)
>  	ring->nr_queues = nr_queues;
>  	ring->fc = fc;
>  	ring->max_payload_sz = max_payload_size;
> -	atomic_set(&ring->queue_refs, 0);
>  
>  	spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
>  	return ring;

Thank you, LGTM. I don't remember why I had added that explicit
initialization.

Reviewed-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com>