From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LSM file locking patch is bogus
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 11:47:53 -0700
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <20020728184753.GB5767@kroah.com>
References: <20020727233149.G1441@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: linux-security-module@wirex.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020727233149.G1441@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 11:31:49PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> 
>  - Remove third argument from file_lock security op.  Whether the lock is
>    blocking or not cannot make any difference to a security module!
>  - Fix the call in sys_flock to pass the translated lock command, not the
>    original.
>  - Add a call in fcntl_setlease.  If they're going to know about two types
>    of lock, let's tell them about the third too.

Thanks a lot for the patch, looks like Linus already took it.

greg k-h