From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel/Glibc: EOPNOTSUPP vs. ENOTSUP vs. ENOTSUPP (also [RFC] POSIX ACL kernel infrastructure)
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 15:46:28 +0100
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <20020804154628.A28845@infradead.org>
References: <200208041546.47041.agruen@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Linux-FSDevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200208041546.47041.agruen@suse.de>; from agruen@suse.de on Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 03:46:47PM +0200
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 03:46:47PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> The standard further says the numbers assigned to ENOTSUP and EOPNOTSUPP
>  shall be unique.

Where?  I can't find it in my copy of 1003.1eD17