From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Kernel/Glibc: EOPNOTSUPP vs. ENOTSUP vs. ENOTSUPP (also [RFC] POSIX ACL kernel infrastructure)
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 10:38:37 +0200
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <200208051038.37561.agruen@suse.de>
References: <200208041546.47041.agruen@suse.de> <20020804154628.A28845@infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Cc: Linux-FSDevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020804154628.A28845@infradead.org>
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Sunday 04 August 2002 16:46, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 03:46:47PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > The standard further says the numbers assigned to ENOTSUP and EOPNOTSUPP
> >  shall be unique.
>
> Where?  I can't find it in my copy of 1003.1eD17

That's in POSIX 1003.1-2001(Austin Group), not in 1003.1e draft 17.

--Andreas.