From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Hudec Subject: Re: why NFS is UDP based Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 10:55:37 +0100 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20030118095536.GA6995@vagabond> References: <20030117191808.GF23044@conectiva.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ronghua Zhang , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030117191808.GF23044@conectiva.com.br> List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 05:18:08PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 03:12:11PM -0500, Ronghua Zhang escreveu: > > I wish I am posting the message to the right place. I am just curious > > what's the most important reason to choose UDP instead of TCP. And when > > some error happens, will NFS do retransmission ? thanks. > > NFS also supports TCP, just config it to use TCP. IIRC only NFS client does. Or is both client and server RPC over TCP already working? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jan 'Bulb' Hudec