From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Subject: Re: handling unrecognised mount options
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 20:34:20 -0800
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <20030316203420.797ad47f.akpm@digeo.com>
References: <20030316144624.69060b84.akpm@digeo.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.30.0303170416190.27925-100000@divine.city.tvnet.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: aebr@win.tue.nl, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from digeo-nav01.digeo.com (digeo-nav01 [192.168.1.233])
	by packet.digeo.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id h2H4YLPw014595
	for <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 20:34:26 -0800 (PST)
To: Szakacsits Szabolcs <szaka@sienet.hu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0303170416190.27925-100000@divine.city.tvnet.hu>
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

Szakacsits Szabolcs <szaka@sienet.hu> wrote:
>
> Another issue is predictibility. If one gives an option he expects the
> driver to behave just like that. Long time convention.
> 

OK, I'll buy that one.

Now what about the inability to switch between kernels?