From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin LaHaise Subject: Re: [PATCH] Filesystem aio rdwr patchset Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 15:27:13 -0500 Sender: owner-linux-aio@kvack.org Message-ID: <20030401152713.B26513@redhat.com> References: <20030401215957.A1800@in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: akpm@digeo.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: Suparna Bhattacharya Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030401215957.A1800@in.ibm.com>; from suparna@in.ibm.com on Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 09:59:57PM +0530 List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 09:59:57PM +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote: > I would really appreciate comments and review feedback > from the perspective of fs developers especially on > the latter 2 patches in terms of whether this seems a > sound approach or if I'm missing something very crucial > (which I just well might be) > Is this easy to do for other filesystems as well ? I disagree with putting the iocb pointer in the task_struct: it feels completely bogus as it modifies semantics behind the scenes without fixing APIs. -ben -- Junk email? aart@kvack.org -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux AIO, see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/ Don't email: aart@kvack.org