From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Use of "device" argument in mount. Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 16:09:33 +0100 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20030509160933.A26840@infradead.org> References: <3EBBBCCB.8B4B24B7@free.fr> <20030509154048.A26528@infradead.org> <3EBBC381.ECEE3FC6@free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from phoenix.mvhi.com ([195.224.96.167]:44046 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263279AbTEIO44 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 May 2003 10:56:56 -0400 To: Jerome de Vivie Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3EBBC381.ECEE3FC6@free.fr>; from jerome.devivie@free.fr on Fri, May 09, 2003 at 05:04:33PM +0200 List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org [dropped the fist list Cc, it would be nice if you could not mix up public and stupid subscriber only lists the next time...] On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 05:04:33PM +0200, Jerome de Vivie wrote: > Yes: in 2.5 sb_get is definable so it's very easy. In 2.4, NFS is using > this device argument but i still don't understand how it works. NFS doesn't use the argument in either 2.4 or 2.5 :)