From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Subject: [PATCH] Mask out O_LARGEFILE in F_GETFL
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 07:25:08 +0200
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <20030925052508.GA2374@averell>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from zero.aec.at ([193.170.194.10]:5894 "EHLO zero.aec.at")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261700AbTIYFZY (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 25 Sep 2003 01:25:24 -0400
To: marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com.br
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org


This fixes a test in the LSB test suite. 

The kernel sets O_LARGEFILE implicitely on 64bit hosts.
According to POSIX it should not appear on F_GETFL then. Just mask it out
always. 

This will also mask it out for explicitely set O_LARGEFILE, but that seems
to be ok.

Any flames for this please to the POSIX comittee, not to me.

-Andi

diff -X ../../KDIFX -burpN linux-2.4.23-pre5/fs/fcntl.c linux-merge/fs/fcntl.c
--- linux-2.4.23-pre5/fs/fcntl.c	2002-11-30 00:37:11.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-merge/fs/fcntl.c	2002-11-30 05:22:20.000000000 +0100
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ static long do_fcntl(unsigned int fd, un
 			set_close_on_exec(fd, arg&1);
 			break;
 		case F_GETFL:
-			err = filp->f_flags;
+			err = filp->f_flags & ~O_LARGEFILE;
 			break;
 		case F_SETFL:
 			lock_kernel();