From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J.A. Magallon" Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] new HFS(+) driver Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 09:04:22 +0200 Sender: linux-hfsplus-devel-admin=5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20031003070422.GA8627@werewolf.able.es> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-hfsplus-devel=5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, linux-fsdevel=u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel=u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Return-path: To: Roman Zippel Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: (from zippel@linux-m68k.org on Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:37:32 +0200) Errors-To: linux-hfsplus-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On 10.02, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > This is a rather big update to the HFS+ driver. It includes now also an > updated HFS driver. Both drivers use now almost the same btree code and > the general structure is very similiar, so one day it will be possible to > merge both drivers. The HFS driver got a major cleanup and a lot of broken > options were removed, most notably if you want to continue using netatalk > with this driver, you have to fix netatalk first. > Two notes: - You should give a patch or at least give a notice that linux/include/hfs* have to be killed (or move hfs_fs.h there). - I had to include linux/sched.h in hfs/sysdep.c to get the definition for 'current', that was neded in some subinclude of linux/smp_lock. This can be caused by any other of my patches, but it doesn't hurt. TIA -- J.A. Magallon \ Software is like sex: werewolf!able!es \ It's better when it's free Mandrake Linux release 9.2 (Cooker) for i586 Linux 2.4.23-pre6-jam1 (gcc 3.3.1 (Mandrake Linux 9.2 3.3.1-2mdk)) ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf