From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] new HFS(+) driver Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 04:00:45 +0100 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20031004030045.GD24824@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <20031003070422.GA8627@werewolf.able.es> <20031003223904.GE30751@werewolf.able.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Roman Zippel , linux-hfsplus-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:57566 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261732AbTJDDAr (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Oct 2003 23:00:47 -0400 To: "J.A. Magallon" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031003223904.GE30751@werewolf.able.es> List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 12:39:04AM +0200, J.A. Magallon wrote: > I applied it, it just keeps mainstream files from including old hfs* files > in include/linux, but the old files stay around (you end with two > versions of hfs_fs.h, one in include/linux and other in fs/hfs...) > I did not move anything, just deleted those old files. But as other > filesystems put their xxxx_fs.h in include/linux, I thought that > perhaps hfs(plus) should do the same. actually more of these should move out of include/linux/ -- "It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or victory, it is about death. I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies. Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk