From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Randy.Dunlap" Subject: Re: fs test suite Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 07:17:55 -0700 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20031007071755.72cf7513.rddunlap@osdl.org> References: <1065499888.6066.26.camel@patehci2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:10417 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262337AbTJGO0d (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2003 10:26:33 -0400 To: Pat LaVarre In-Reply-To: <1065499888.6066.26.camel@patehci2> List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On 06 Oct 2003 22:11:28 -0600 Pat LaVarre wrote: | Anybody got an fs test suite posted that I could easily apply to the udf | of linux-2.6.0-test6? | | I ask because I'm seeing ext3 work fine on top of loop devices, not so | udf. Are you looking for a test (suite) that tests fs metadata moreso than fs IO? People have asked for that a few times, but I don't know of one that is made for that. Here are some possibilities: iozone - all sorts of read/write testing, little metadata http://www.iozone.org postmark - email-like tester, mostly small files, with file create/delete [google for it] fsx - tester that has stressed (and busted) extN and nfs several times [I would start here.] from: http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/cruft/ or: http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/ (these might be different versions of the same prog.) -- ~Randy