Re: fs test suite

["Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>]

In that vein, there's also the Linux Test Project (LTP),
  http://ltp.sourceforge.net/

--
~Randy


On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 07:59:59 -0700 (PDT) Zachary Peterson <zachary@cse.ucsc.edu> wrote:

| 
| Also try Connectathon, which runs a series of individual system call
| tests, that look for correctness and deliver performance metrics.
| 
| http://www.connectathon.org/
| 
| It's not great, but free.
| 
| Zachary
| 
| 
| =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| Zachary Peterson       zachary@cse.ucsc.edu
|                        http://znjp.com
| 
| 856D 29FA E1F7 DB5E 9215  C68D 5F0F 3929 C929 9A72
| 
| On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
| 
| >On 06 Oct 2003 22:11:28 -0600 Pat LaVarre <p.lavarre@ieee.org> wrote:
| >
| >| Anybody got an fs test suite posted that I could easily apply to the udf
| >| of linux-2.6.0-test6?
| >|
| >| I ask because I'm seeing ext3 work fine on top of loop devices, not so
| >| udf.
| >
| >Are you looking for a test (suite) that tests fs metadata moreso
| >than fs IO?  People have asked for that a few times, but I don't
| >know of one that is made for that.
| >
| >Here are some possibilities:
| >
| >iozone - all sorts of read/write testing, little metadata
| >		http://www.iozone.org
| >postmark - email-like tester, mostly small files, with file
| >	create/delete
| >		[google for it]
| >fsx - tester that has stressed (and busted) extN and nfs several
| >	times  [I would start here.]
| >	from:  http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/cruft/
| >	or:    http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/
| >		(these might be different versions of the same prog.)
| >
| >--