Re: Implementing writepage

[Mark B <mark@lemna.hr>]

On Sunday 26 October 2003 16:28, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 10:25:49AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > Your file system is not broken; your application author is. Mend that
> > instead. :)
>
> I don't see why every application should be rewritten for the needs of
> the current generation of flash.  If this is such a problem for flash,
> then maybe the filesystem should implement its own caching strategy
> for these pages.  (Again, expecting the page cache to understand about
> flash's special requirements is unreasonable.)
>
> Your argument makes sense for the embedded market, but not for mainstream.

I agree,
and someone maybe even cares to use the expensive flashs to keep the data 
secure, because in some cases the data is more valuable then the drive, but 
there are not so much data for use a RAID or something, it's like using a 
cannon to kill a mosquito.
I'm telling this from expirience, since I'm currently developing a filesystem 
for such a purpose, with minimising writes and aligning them to the pages of 
the media + supporting small transactions across files (via ioctl hints by 
the app) + usual journalling.

-- 
Mark Burazin 
mark@lemna.hr
---<>---<>---<>---<>---<>---<>---<>---<>---<>
Lemna d.o.o.
http://www.lemna.biz - info@lemna.hr
<>---<>---<>---<>---<>---<>---<>---<>---<>---