From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Randy.Dunlap" Subject: Re: vfs whitebox test Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 09:09:30 -0800 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20031125090930.281f7864.rddunlap@osdl.org> References: <1069716562.4649.14.camel@patrh9> <1069775182.6929.14.camel@patrh9> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:30369 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261735AbTKYRPe (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:15:34 -0500 To: Pat LaVarre In-Reply-To: <1069775182.6929.14.camel@patrh9> List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On 25 Nov 2003 08:46:22 -0700 Pat LaVarre wrote: | > Anybody already pull together some more closely interactive way of | > trying creative patterns of calls thru the vfs layer? | | >From the linux-fsdevel 2003-10-07 archives "Re: fs test suite", we know | possibilities, perhaps sorted now from most to least accessible, | include: | | http://ltp.sourceforge.net/ fsstress e.g. | http://www.iozone.org Lots of file I/O, little VFS metadata activity. | http://www.connectathon.org/ | | http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/cruft/ fsx-linux in particular | http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/ | | http://www.google.com/search?q=postmark+linux postmark typically works with many small files and does more VFS metadata operations than a workload like IOzone or tiobench (sf.net). | http://www.google.com/search?q=bonnie+linux | | By now I can testify that at a glance these particular links do Not say | if they point only to ways of running up in the stratospheric layer of | open/ read/ write/ close, or not. -- ~Randy MOTD: Always include version info.