From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Otte <cotte@freenet.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext3 [linux-2.6.2.]: accessing already freed inodes when under memory pressure
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:35:41 +0100
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <200402192135.43639.cotte@freenet.de>
References: <200402191321.39592.cotte@freenet.de> <200402192128.12923.cotte@freenet.de> <20040219202657.GF31035@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	"Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>, torvalds@osdl.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	cotte@de.ibm.com
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mout2.freenet.de ([194.97.50.155]:34006 "EHLO mout2.freenet.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267561AbUBSUcB convert rfc822-to-8bit
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:32:01 -0500
To: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
In-Reply-To: <20040219202657.GF31035@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
Content-Description: clearsigned data
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

Am Donnerstag 19 Februar 2004 21:26 schrieb 
viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk:
> We hold ->i_sem *on* *the* *inode*.  And yes, unlink does grab it both
> on parent and child.
True. The problem is, that both are released before the inode is been removed 
from the s_orphan list.