public inbox for linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>,
	Carsten Otte <cotte@freenet.de>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, sct@redhat.com,
	Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext3 [linux-2.6.2.]: accessing already freed inodes when under memory pressure
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 20:37:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040402193714.GF31500@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404021127200.1122@ppc970.osdl.org>

On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 11:32:26AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > 
> > I think the useful thing to do is return a different st_dev value for
> > each bind mount.
> 
> Naah. You _want_ user space to see that they are the same file, and then 
> the algorithm should be: "open+open+fstat+fstat+cmp st_dev/st_ino".
> 
> But I agree that it might be good to also have a way to enquire about
> mount information. One logical place for that might be "fstatfs()".  
> We've got a few spare bytes there, so it wouldn't be impossible to do.

I'm not sure what we want to expose there, though.  Address of vfsmount
would certainly be unique, but...   Generation number would be safer,
but we will need to be careful about uniqueness of that animal.  How much
free space do we have there?

  reply	other threads:[~2004-04-02 19:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-30 11:57 [PATCH] ext3 [linux-2.6.2.]: accessing already freed inodes when under memory pressure Martin Schwidefsky
2004-03-30 13:39 ` David Woodhouse
2004-03-30 14:16   ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-03-30 15:51   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-04-02 16:12     ` viro
2004-04-02 18:01       ` viro
2004-04-02 18:52         ` Linus Torvalds
2004-04-02 19:02           ` Linus Torvalds
2004-04-02 19:10             ` viro
2004-04-02 19:07           ` viro
2004-04-02 20:23             ` viro
2004-04-02 22:40               ` Trond Myklebust
2004-04-02 23:06                 ` viro
2004-04-02 23:23                   ` Trond Myklebust
2004-04-03  0:53                     ` Neil Brown
2004-04-02 23:19                 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-04-02 19:17           ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-02 19:25             ` viro
2004-04-02 19:32             ` Linus Torvalds
2004-04-02 19:37               ` viro [this message]
2004-04-02 19:45                 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-04-02 20:08                   ` viro
2004-04-02 20:40               ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-02 20:59                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-02 21:09                   ` viro
2004-04-02 23:42                   ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-02 21:08                 ` viro
2004-04-03  0:39                   ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-05 14:07                   ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-03-30 15:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-04-02 16:14   ` viro
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-30 15:13 Martin Schwidefsky
2004-03-29 19:07 Martin Schwidefsky
2004-03-29 20:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-03-29 20:29   ` Dave Kleikamp
2004-02-19 18:00 Martin Schwidefsky
2004-02-19 12:21 Carsten Otte
2004-02-19 16:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-19 17:39   ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-02-19 18:49     ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-19 20:28       ` Carsten Otte
2004-02-19 20:26         ` viro
2004-02-19 20:35           ` Carsten Otte
2004-02-19 20:14     ` Carsten Otte
2004-02-20  3:41       ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-19 20:19   ` Carsten Otte
     [not found] ` <20040220164325.659c4e45.akpm@osdl.org>
     [not found]   ` <200402241338.57855.cotte@freenet.de>
2004-02-24 22:55     ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040402193714.GF31500@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    --to=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=cotte@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cotte@freenet.de \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    --cc=shaggy@austin.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox