From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: RFC: adding an "fs" directory under /sys Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 22:55:09 +0100 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040417225509.A21192@infradead.org> References: <482A3FA0050D21419C269D13989C611302B07C17@lavender-fe.eng.netapp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk, linux-fsdevel , Trond Myklebust , Patrick Mochel , Linus Torvalds Return-path: Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([213.86.99.234]:19216 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264048AbUDQVzM (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Apr 2004 17:55:12 -0400 To: "Lever, Charles" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <482A3FA0050D21419C269D13989C611302B07C17@lavender-fe.eng.netapp.com>; from Charles.Lever@netapp.com on Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 02:51:48PM -0700 List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 02:51:48PM -0700, Lever, Charles wrote: > so, i take it you would prefer me to add a kobject to the > nfs_server struct for my purposes, rather than use the > unused kobject that is *already* embedded in the > super_block? I think Al wants you to understand what you're trying to do first. Please read up about the kobject lifetime rules first, if you can make the nfs_server lifetime work with kobjects expectation go for it, but don't think it's easy.