From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Hudec Subject: Re: which dentry a page belongs to Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 10:44:46 +0200 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040424084445.GB7119@vagabond> References: <1082732223.1943.11.camel@zaphod> <20040423151458.GC6300@mail.shareable.org> <1082734938.1943.26.camel@zaphod> <20040423173738.A3812@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ" Cc: Shaya Potter , Jamie Lokier , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from cimice4.lam.cz ([212.71.168.94]:34984 "EHLO vagabond.light.src") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262071AbUDXIpm (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Apr 2004 04:45:42 -0400 To: Christoph Hellwig Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040423173738.A3812@infradead.org> List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 17:37:38 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > in 2.4 writepage is always the result of data dirtied by mmap. In 2.6 it's > also for use for data dirtied by write. Even in 2.4 there's no gurantee > the mapping that dirtied the page still exists when the page is written out > by the VM. No, It's the same in 2.4 and 2.6 -- both may use writepage for write (depends on how you implement your commit_write). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jan 'Bulb' Hudec --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAiij9Rel1vVwhjGURAjghAKCq46XRSC/HoOcZ8opBkRtmOoayagCgj5AS Mo2D8zu9ImVCRCJvpIjiXYc= =rgyX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ--