linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Werner Almesberger <wa@almesberger.net>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: barriers vs. reads
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:53:02 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040622005302.A1325@almesberger.net> (raw)

I'm working on an elevator with priorities, and I'm wondering what
semantics are expected from barriers when it comes to reads.

My problem with read barriers is that they can upset priorities
quite a bit, by forcing the entire queue to be processed before
any new (possibly timing-critical) reads are allowed.

So, is there anything that actually depends on barriers also
constraining read - or, more likely, read vs. write - order ?
If not, will there be ?

Also, it seems, but is never quite explicitly spelt out, that an
elevator is never really supposed to look for barriers in
rq->flags, but can solely rely on the insertion position as an
indication for barriers. Is this true ?

Thanks,
- Werner

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________________
 / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina         wa@almesberger.net /
/_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/

             reply	other threads:[~2004-06-22  3:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-22  3:53 Werner Almesberger [this message]
2004-06-22  7:39 ` barriers vs. reads Jens Axboe
2004-06-22  7:50   ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-22  7:55     ` Jens Axboe
2004-06-22  8:34       ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-22 10:08         ` Jens Axboe
2004-06-22 11:28       ` Jamie Lokier
2004-06-22 11:32         ` Jens Axboe
2004-06-22 17:12           ` Bryan Henderson
2004-06-22 20:53             ` Jens Axboe
2004-06-23 16:41               ` Bryan Henderson
2004-06-23 16:52                 ` Jens Axboe
2004-06-23 16:53                 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-06-23 21:08                   ` Bryan Henderson
2004-06-23 23:23                   ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-24 13:43                     ` Jamie Lokier
2004-06-24 14:32                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-06-24 17:05                       ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-22 18:53           ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-22 19:57             ` Jamie Lokier
2004-06-22 23:13               ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-22 20:57             ` Jens Axboe
2004-06-22 23:10               ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-23  0:14                 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-06-23  6:27                 ` Jens Axboe
2004-06-22 18:45         ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-22 19:07           ` Guy
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-24  0:48 Werner Almesberger
2004-06-24  3:39 ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-24  8:00   ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-06-24 12:16     ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-24 13:36   ` Jamie Lokier
2004-06-24 17:02     ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-24 16:39 ` Steve Lord

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040622005302.A1325@almesberger.net \
    --to=wa@almesberger.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).