From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Werner Almesberger Subject: Re: elevator priorities vs. full request queues Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:46:32 -0300 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040623094632.L1325@almesberger.net> References: <20040622012502.B1325@almesberger.net> <20040622074852.GW12881@suse.de> <20040622052644.D1325@almesberger.net> <20040622101434.GB12881@suse.de> <20040622160859.I1325@almesberger.net> <20040623101430.GI1120@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from almesberger.net ([63.105.73.238]:54799 "EHLO host.almesberger.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266471AbUFWMqm (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:46:42 -0400 To: Jens Axboe Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040623101430.GI1120@suse.de>; from axboe@suse.de on Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 12:14:31PM +0200 List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Jens Axboe wrote: > Something like this Hmm, this means that also all the way to submit_bh needs instrumentation to pass the priority to the bio. What would you think of simply passing the bio ? That might also gives us more flexibility to play with other priority schemes. Thank, - Werner -- _________________________________________________________________________ / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina wa@almesberger.net / /_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/