linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Werner Almesberger <wa@almesberger.net>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: Bryan Henderson <hbryan@us.ibm.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: barriers vs. reads - O_DIRECT
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:55:16 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040624175516.W1325@almesberger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040624185059.GA11175@mail.shareable.org>; from jamie@shareable.org on Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 07:50:59PM +0100

Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Note that what filesystems and databases want is write-write *partial
> dependencies*.  The per-device I/O barrier is just a crude
> approximation.

True ;-) So what would an ideally flexible model look like ?
Partial order ? Triggers plus virtual requests ? There's also
the little issue that this should still yield an interface
that people can understand without taking a semester of
graph theory ;-)

> 3. What if a journal is on a different device to its filesystem?

"Don't do this" comes to mind :-)

> Isn't the barrier itself an I/O operation which can be waited on?
> I agree something could depend on the reads at the moment.

Making barriers waitable might be very useful, yes. That could
also be a step towards implementing those cross-device barriers.

- Werner

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________________
 / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina         wa@almesberger.net /
/_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/

  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-24 20:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-24  0:48 barriers vs. reads Werner Almesberger
2004-06-24  3:39 ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-24  8:00   ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-06-24 12:16     ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-24 13:36   ` Jamie Lokier
2004-06-24 17:02     ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-24 16:39 ` Steve Lord
2004-06-24 17:00 ` barriers vs. reads - O_DIRECT Bryan Henderson
2004-06-24 17:46   ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-24 18:50     ` Jamie Lokier
2004-06-24 20:55       ` Werner Almesberger [this message]
2004-06-24 22:42         ` Jamie Lokier
2004-06-25  3:21           ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-25  3:57           ` Guy
2004-06-25  4:52             ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-25  0:11     ` Bryan Henderson
2004-06-25  2:42       ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-25 15:59         ` barriers vs. reads - O_DIRECT aio Bryan Henderson
2004-06-25 16:31         ` barriers vs. reads - O_DIRECT Bryan Henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040624175516.W1325@almesberger.net \
    --to=wa@almesberger.net \
    --cc=hbryan@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).