From: Werner Almesberger <wa@almesberger.net>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: Bryan Henderson <hbryan@us.ibm.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: barriers vs. reads - O_DIRECT
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:55:16 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040624175516.W1325@almesberger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040624185059.GA11175@mail.shareable.org>; from jamie@shareable.org on Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 07:50:59PM +0100
Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Note that what filesystems and databases want is write-write *partial
> dependencies*. The per-device I/O barrier is just a crude
> approximation.
True ;-) So what would an ideally flexible model look like ?
Partial order ? Triggers plus virtual requests ? There's also
the little issue that this should still yield an interface
that people can understand without taking a semester of
graph theory ;-)
> 3. What if a journal is on a different device to its filesystem?
"Don't do this" comes to mind :-)
> Isn't the barrier itself an I/O operation which can be waited on?
> I agree something could depend on the reads at the moment.
Making barriers waitable might be very useful, yes. That could
also be a step towards implementing those cross-device barriers.
- Werner
--
_________________________________________________________________________
/ Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina wa@almesberger.net /
/_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-24 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-24 0:48 barriers vs. reads Werner Almesberger
2004-06-24 3:39 ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-24 8:00 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-06-24 12:16 ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-24 13:36 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-06-24 17:02 ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-24 16:39 ` Steve Lord
2004-06-24 17:00 ` barriers vs. reads - O_DIRECT Bryan Henderson
2004-06-24 17:46 ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-24 18:50 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-06-24 20:55 ` Werner Almesberger [this message]
2004-06-24 22:42 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-06-25 3:21 ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-25 3:57 ` Guy
2004-06-25 4:52 ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-25 0:11 ` Bryan Henderson
2004-06-25 2:42 ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-25 15:59 ` barriers vs. reads - O_DIRECT aio Bryan Henderson
2004-06-25 16:31 ` barriers vs. reads - O_DIRECT Bryan Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040624175516.W1325@almesberger.net \
--to=wa@almesberger.net \
--cc=hbryan@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).