From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:43:34 +0200
Message-ID: <20040826124334.GA39176@dspnet.fr.eu.org>
References: <20040824202521.GA26705@lst.de> <20040825163225.4441cfdd.akpm@osdl.org> <1093510983.23289.6.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> <200408261245.47734.christian.mayrhuber@gmx.net> <20040826115229.A18013@infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-20655-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Christian Mayrhuber <christian.mayrhuber@gmx.net>,
	reiserfs-list@namesys.com, Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040826115229.A18013@infradead.org>
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 11:52:29AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Sure, no one stops you from playing around with new semantics.  But please
> don't add them to the linux kernel stable series until we have semantics we
> a) want to stick to for a while and b) actually work.

He's not proposing to add it to 2.4, is he?

  OG.