From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4 Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 13:44:15 +0100 Message-ID: <20040826134415.A19244@infradead.org> References: <20040824202521.GA26705@lst.de> <20040825163225.4441cfdd.akpm@osdl.org> <1093510983.23289.6.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> <200408261245.47734.christian.mayrhuber@gmx.net> <20040826115229.A18013@infradead.org> <20040826124334.GA39176@dspnet.fr.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com To: Olivier Galibert , Christoph Hellwig , Christian Mayrhuber , reiserfs-list@namesys.com, Anton Altaparmakov , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, lkml Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040826124334.GA39176@dspnet.fr.eu.org>; from galibert@pobox.com on Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 02:43:34PM +0200 List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 02:43:34PM +0200, Olivier Galibert wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 11:52:29AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Sure, no one stops you from playing around with new semantics. But please > > don't add them to the linux kernel stable series until we have semantics we > > a) want to stick to for a while and b) actually work. > > He's not proposing to add it to 2.4, is he? We're talking about 2.6 here. 2.4 is the obsolete kernel series these days.