From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4 Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 00:05:46 +0200 Message-ID: <20040826220546.GA12401@lst.de> References: <20040825152805.45a1ce64.akpm@osdl.org> <412D9FE6.9050307@namesys.com> <20040826014542.4bfe7cc3.akpm@osdl.org> <412DAC59.4010508@namesys.com> <1093548414.5678.74.camel@krustophenia.net> <20040826203017.GA14361@school.ioffe.ru> <1093552692.13881.43.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> <16686.22336.829096.678178@thebsh.namesys.com> <1093556818.13881.75.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> <16686.24120.761440.969273@thebsh.namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov , Hans Reiser , Andrew Morton , hch@lst.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel , flx@namesys.com, torvalds@osdl.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com To: Nikita Danilov Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16686.24120.761440.969273@thebsh.namesys.com> List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 02:03:36AM +0400, Nikita Danilov wrote: > > What about fs/reiser4/plugin/node/ and fs/reiser4/plugin/disk_format/? > > > > Of course you can implement another filesystem inside the plugins but > > they wouldn't use fs/reiser4/*.c, so this would be rather stupid. Right? > > > > That was the message of my message. And I think Christophe and me already agreed in this thread that these upper level plugin facility should go away before merge anyway. We made the mistake of not requesting removel of that one for XFS and now SGI blocks it's removal.