From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Alfaro Solana Subject: Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4 Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 00:30:19 +0200 Message-ID: <200408270030.20647.lkml@felipe-alfaro.com> References: <1093536282.5482.6.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Christophe Saout , Rik van Riel , Jamie Lokier , Denis Vlasenko , Christer Weinigel , Spam , Andrew Morton , wichert@wiggy.net, jra@samba.org, torvalds@osdl.org, reiser@namesys.com, hch@lst.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, flx@namesys.com, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com To: David Lang In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Thursday 26 August 2004 23:05, David Lang wrote: > I also don't see why the VFS/Filesystem can't decide that (for example) > this tar.gz is so active that instead of storing it as a tar.gz and > providing a virtual directory of the contents that it instead stores the > directory of the contents and makes the tar.gz virtual (regenerating it as > needed or as extra system resources are available) Because that would mean the kernel should "talk" the tar format, which is, IMHO, a Bad Idea (TM). Maybe the kernel could notify a user-space daemon to perform this task, instead.