From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4 Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:24:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20040827102402.C29672@infradead.org> References: <20040824202521.GA26705@lst.de> <412CEE38.1080707@namesys.com> <20040825152805.45a1ce64.akpm@osdl.org> <412D9FE6.9050307@namesys.com> <20040826014542.4bfe7cc3.akpm@osdl.org> <412DAC59.4010508@namesys.com> <1093548414.5678.74.camel@krustophenia.net> <1093548815.13881.10.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> <412EEB59.7010101@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christophe Saout , Lee Revell , Andrew Morton , hch@lst.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel , flx@namesys.com, torvalds@osdl.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com To: Hans Reiser Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <412EEB59.7010101@namesys.com>; from reiser@namesys.com on Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 01:05:45AM -0700 List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 01:05:45AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote: > Not necessarily. We just encourage it.... Reiser4 is a body of code > that can be sliced and diced as you choose, and it is designed for easy > slicing. So what about slicing it into a simple posix fs as a start so we can review that while still discussing semantic issues. Now that would be a refreshing thing after all that talking, no?