From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mjt@nysv.org (Markus Törnqvist) Subject: Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4 Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 23:53:32 +0300 Message-ID: <20040827205332.GD1284@nysv.org> References: <412D9FE6.9050307@namesys.com> <200408261812.i7QICW8r002679@localhost.localdomain> <20040827203216.GC1284@nysv.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Horst von Brand , Hans Reiser , Andrew Morton , hch@lst.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, flx@namesys.com, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com To: Linus Torvalds Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 01:38:28PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >Heh. Considering that WinFS seems to be delayed yet more, I don't think >that's a very strong argument. But there's Mac OS and isn't Solaris doing something along these lines? Microsoft isn't alone there ;) >scare people with MS activities. Linux kernel developers do what's right >because it is _right_, not because somebody else does it. Never really doubted that, mind you. I just think this is both right and a competition situation. -- mjt